Grayson Perry (4th artist lecture of lockdown).
I feel like I don’t have that much to say about
Grayson Perry, I don’t really resonate with him, his work or even his motives
that seem to be important in his practice. Such as his value of the artists
being a celebrity and this kind of idea of an artists ego. This idea was
something that was spoke about a lot throughout the documentary, Grayson
expressed his desire to make this kind of celebrity artifact, an artwork that
would be in a museum not an art gallery and viewed like a relic almost. I
definitely don’t think I resonate with these kind of ideas, but I guess it is
interesting to see an artists discussing and owning their desire to be a
celebrity almost, compared to my own opinion where this is definitely not what
art is about, if you get me.


I honestly feel like I don’t have anything important
or analytical to say about this documentary, I’ve basically just spoke about
how I found it funny. I guess there were a couple of comments Grayson made
about his art practice that I do understand and fell myself. He mentioned how
he often just does what he feels is right and later figures out what it is,
which I get, for a lot of my works recently I have a rough idea when making the
work and as the project goes on or maybe even the moment I perform, I suddenly
have a clearer understanding of what the is about. I also found that some of
his works especially the shrine to Alan where quite conceptually chaotic and to
an extent this is something I’ve been finding with certain works of my own and
have been worried about how this can come across to viewers.
Comments
Post a Comment