Jorge Menna Barreto

-

I love Jorge’s work and practice so much literally so much of what he was discussing relates to my practice, the lecture even related to my essay right now.
Throughout the lecture and the Q + A Jorge explained how his practice heavily involves site-specific projects as he lets the site decide what he will build/create and even what he is going to eat. He showed this quote to the right in the lecture when explaining his inspirations and thought of investigating the relationship between agroecology and site-specificity in his practice.
Many of Jorge’s works are environmental sculptural installations that explore the complexities of food and its relationship with society and nature. For instance, in the Bienal de Sao Paulo 2016, Jorge showed ‘Restauro’, which began with Jorge exploring this forest, working with farmers, investigating the foods provided by the forest whilst also recording the sounds of the forest. Using this research Jorge created ‘Restauro’ which is an environmental sculpture that operates as a restaurant as he brought food from that forest to create a menu, for the audience to eat. Jorge explained the use of audience interaction in his work as having the audience engage through eating it allows us to consider the human digestive system as a sculptural tool, becoming part of the sculpture. This raises questions around the environmental issues related to eating habits and their effect in the climate, encouraging awareness of food politics and climate change emergency.
When making work that raises these questions of climate change the art can often be seen as ‘pushy’ which is something I have been considering in my own work, as I have experience negative feedback with some works in development that had a clear political message. Jorge addressed this issue in a way that allowed the work to be what I feel would have been more effective, as he explained how his work has no text or explanations around ‘Restauro’ explaining it was an artwork, which did mean a lot of the audience didn’t actually realise ‘Restauro’ was even an artwork, however he had a system in place where if someone was to ask about the work or what this was to one of the workers at the project (who wore orange shirts as a uniform) then they would be able to discuss the piece and the artists ideas and inspirations with the audience member. Having this access to knowledge of the piece only being given when prompted by an audience member seems to be an effective means of having those specific members of the audience engage with the work.
This is definitely a useful point for me to think about and when I had my tutorial with Jorge, we discussed these topics further, mentioning how the audience need the “ability to respond” in order to encourage engagement and interaction with the art work.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Laura Yule

-
Image
From the work Laura Yule showed us in the lecture I seen that a lot of her work uses specific materials like, pebbles, electrical appliances and manikins. There also seems to be an occurring theme with Laura's work which is the idea of how we are becoming too dependent on electrical appliances and social media.  The first project Laura spoke about was her on going work with pebble dashing. Firstly focusing on our dependence on everyday electronic devices, she showed an installation of appliances she found and managed to get for free at junk yards such as a Samsung television and fridges that she then pebble dashed almost freezing these appliances. Laura thought about how we use these appliances in how she positioned them. From this project Yule made a bigger series using the same techniques and thoughts. This time she made commercial homes, using manikins, furniture and once again electronic devices. When installing these pieces she really focused on how commercial homes are set o...
Read more

Gabrielle de la Puente (lecture and tutorial)

-
Image
Gabrielle is only the bloody creator of the Output Gallery and I’m so psyched we got a lecture from her and I had a tutorial with her afterwards and it was so useful because I was literally in the middle of co-curating my own exhibition the ‘flat mat cat exhibition’, In fact I think meeting with Gabrielle was actually two days before the show. In the lecture Gabrielle discussed the Output galleries values such as wanting to get artists from and based in Liverpool involved and the importance of listening and taking suggestions from others (especially other artists), therefore shaping the identity of the gallery. I think this is amazing and I feel like I kind of related this back to my exhibition and how it was a mixture of multiple artists and art historians input to create the show we had and this definitely made the show what it was and not to toot my own horn, but it was a sick show. Some advice that Gabrielle mentioned in the lecture was that some things such as critic...
Read more

Stephen Sutcliffe

-
Image
In the lecture I realised that Stephan spoke more about his inspirations , thought processes and other people then he did talk about his own work, but this makes sense for his practice. Sutcliffe explained how growing up television and media/pop culture are a huge aspect in his relationship and understanding of art. Throughout the lecture Stephen when describing his work, he would explain the specific reasons and influences leading to works. For instance, for Stephan’s piece ‘AB…’ where he took an interview of Anthony Burgess and edited the video to be in alphabetical order. I thought this piece was so clever and witty its hilarious and before showing the video , Stephen spoke about how he tried to read this book ‘Alphabetical Africa’ by Walter Abish, which was placed in the top 10 of the hardest to finish books. Stephan edited the interview to be in the same style as the writing of the book. There was a similar kind of book Stephen spoke about being another huge insp...
Read more